|
Land Cover Data Description
Restoration Planning: Helpful for identifying important habitat areas and plant community types. Can avoid harming critical habitat during restoration work and also attempt to reconnect areas of important habitat through restoration efforts. Data Description: NRIS has several land cover databases. The most useful at present for Upper Clark Fork restoration planning is the Montana GAP database which is described here. Landsat Thematic Mapper Images of Montana were interpreted to provide ARC/INFO files of land cover, stewardship (management entity), and predicted distribution of 425 terrestrial vertebrate species, based on cover types considered to be suitable habitat for each species. Location of sample sites/areas assessed: all of Montana + 10 km buffer Nature of location info in database: ARC/INFO; All images (but 2) were in an Albers Equal Area Conic projection with these parameters: units = meters; spheroid = Clarke 1866; datum = NAD27; 1st Parallel = 46 degrees; 2nd Parallel = 48 degrees; Central Meridian = -109.5 degrees; Latitude of projection’s origin = 44.25 degrees; False Easting = 600,000 meters;
False Northing = 0. Duration and Frequency of Sampling: single Landsat
image per site, most from 1989-92,
a few from 1993-4. Update frequency —no plans to update at
present—static, one time assessment. Parameters measured & methods used: Land Cover types, stewardship (management entity), potential habitat of 450 terrestrial vertebrate species. Land cover types are based on:
Fisher, F.B.,J.C. Winne, M.M. Thornton, T.P. Tady, Z. Ma, M.M. Hart, and
R.L. Redmond. 1998.
Montana land cover atlas. Unpubl report.
Montana Cooperative Wildlife Research Unit, The University of Montana,
Missoula. viii + 50 pp. /nsdi/nris/gap90/mtcover.pdf Land cover is classified into 50 land cover types (various
subdivisions of urban, agricultural, grasslands, shrublands, forests, water,
riparian, barren, alpine, perennial snow & ice—see table 2.1 of
the Redmond report under Relevant References below). Mapping inputs & assumptions include:
Quality of data:
Data are meant to be used at a scale of 1:100,000 or coarser. Input
images had a final pixel size of 30
sq. meter. The grid cell size is 90
sq meters and the minimum map unit is 2 ha.
Reference:
The report below describes input data and methods used to generate
the database: Redmond, R.L., M.M. Hart, J.C. Winne, W.A. Williams, P.C.
Thornton, Z. Ma, C.M. Tobalske, M.M.
Thornton, K.P. McLaughlin, T.P. Tady, F.B. Fisher, S.W. Running.
1998. The Montana Gap
Analysis Project: final report. Unpublished
report. Montana Cooperative
Wildlife Research Unit, The
University of Montana, Missoula. xiii
+ 136 pp. + appendices. On-line at /nsdi/nris/gap90/mtgapveg.pdf Contact information: Developed by MT Wildlife
Research Unit at University of Montana, but this entity does not provide support. Data
available through Montana State Library (NRIS). Most knowledgeable contact
person at NRIS is:
Gerry Daumiller
(gdaumiller@state.mt.us) How to obtain data:
Restoration Planning: Potentially useful for basin-wide, multi-agency planning, but the scale (1:500,000) is too coarse for specific project planning. Data Description: The ecological subregions map created by the USFS Northern Region is available from NRIS as a GIS layer. This map divides the land up into areas that have similar surficial geology, lithology, geomorphic processes, soil groups, climate and potential plant communities. The coverage is statewide, including parts of Idaho. There are several different ecoregions in the Upper Clark Fork study area. Metadata for this map can be obtained from NRIS: /nsdi/nris/ot118.html How to obtain data:
|